After three years and more than $300,000 spent on the “Free the Nipple,” campaign, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a topless ban in Fort Collins after a district court judge ruled it unconstitutional, violating the 14th Amendment since it only applied to women.
Utah is one of six states that fall under the jurisdiction of the 10th Circuit Court, which also includes Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Wyoming.
The 10th Circuit ruling effectively means that topless bans in those six states listed are no longer enforceable.
Mayor Jon Pike told St. George News the city “pays attention to any ruling that comes down from the 10th Circuit Court,” adding the issue will be discussed with the city attorney. The ramifications of the court’s decision remain unclear at this point, both for St. George and for Utah as a whole.
READ ALSO: Lost In The Wind: Nigeria’s Vice President Turns Off Comment On Instagram Page As He Prepares To Move Out Of Aso Rock
“The 10th Circuit Court has made a ruling,” Pike said. “We’ll cooperate, and are resolved to work within the framework of the appellate system we have in place.”
The original case was filed by Free the Nipple and two women, Brittiany Hoagland and Samantha Six, in May, 2016, when they sued the city of Fort Collins for their right to go topless in public.
The 10th Circuit Court decision was issued in February, at which point Fort Collins filed a series of continuances to appeal the decision. In the end, however, the city opted not to continue fighting the decision, allowing women in the six states to go topless without legal repercussions.
In the lawsuit, the city challenged the nudity ban by saying it “criminalizes women who appear in public” with their breasts exposed.
“(The law) is a sexist ordinance that is based on antiquated social mores; justification for the ordinance is rooted in outdated nineteenth-century puritanical values and discrimination, nothing more,” they argued. “Men continue to enjoy the ability to engage in this exact same behavior without the fear of criminal prosecution.”
Under the former ordinance in Fort Collins, females over age 10 were not allowed to knowingly expose their breasts in any public place or on certain private properties that could be viewed from a public area, or they could face misdemeanor charges and be fined up to $2,650, face up to 180 days in jail, or both. The ban did not extend to women breastfeeding in public.
The 10th Circuit Court ruled that the city’s claim that the ban was designed for the purpose of protecting children was not derived from the anatomical differences between men’s and woman’s breasts, but instead, “from negative stereotypes depicting women’s breasts, but not men’s breasts, as sex objects,” Circuit Judge Gregory Phillips wrote in the decision.
The decision also said Fort Collins “presented no evidence of any harmful fallout,” should the nudity ban be lifted.
The justices also cited Dr. Roberts’ testimony, which stated that the naked female breast “is seen as disorderly or dangerous because society, from Renaissance paintings to Victoria’s Secret commercials, has conflated female breasts with genitalia and stereotyped them as such.”
District Court Judge Harris L. Hartz disagreed with the ruling, and in his dissenting opinion, said that nudity laws in general, “may be justified as reducing or preventing antisocial behavior caused by indecent exposure,” adding the laws are designed to prevent behaviors such as assault, youth corruption, or even “distraction from productive activity.”
READ ALSO: South-west Pastor Tipped To Replace Osinbajo As VP Finally Unveiled
Are you an artiste? Do you want your music to go viral and reach a large number of audience? Promote your music and Submit your story on Ujuayalogusblog.com by clicking here. For Advert Inquiries Tel/+44(0)7590363984
For More: Subscribe to Ujuayalogusblog.com
No comments:
Post a Comment